Nice study material and fair price, but hope to correct the typos
Very helpful material and the price is reasonable. Worth the purchase. But there are many typos to be corrected. One of the major ones I can remember is in the case study question, the resource gave information about “project architect”, which is referred to in the question as “architectural designer”. This causes major confusion. It will be helpful if some of the references can be more specific.
Hi,
Thanks for your comment. I am happy that you found the questions helpful and the price reasonable. Both of these aspects are my two primary goals. I fixed the issue you mentioned in your comment about the case study question. Since there are only two team members in the scenario, I didn’t think it could be confusing to tweak the titles. Also, I have never gotten criticism regarding this specific question in about two years, so I didn’t think it was an issue. But regardless, I understand your point, so I revised the question accordingly. I genuinely respect constructive criticism, and every time I get an email about any of my questions, I pay attention and do my best to clarify or tweak the question to improve it. I wish you could also send me a list of questions you need to be clarified, and I am sure I could explain them further.